The impact of sandbox evasion
on security automation

iscover how anti-sandbox evasion impacts security automation and why it’s crucial for effective threat analysis and response.

In the realm of cybersecurity, automation has emerged as a crucial tool in the battle against evolving threats. Security automation promises faster threat detection, improved response times, and reduced workload for analysts. However, the effectiveness of automation in security operations heavily relies on the capabilities of the underlying technologies, especially when it comes to analyzing potentially malicious files and software.

The challenge of automation

Automation is a cornerstone of modern security operations. Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Extended Detection and Response (XDR) tools generate a substantial volume of alerts related to potentially malicious activities. These alerts are akin to digital red flags, signaling the possible presence of malware or other security threats within an organization’s network or systems.

In an ideal scenario, these alerts would be swiftly and accurately triaged, enabling security teams to respond promptly to emerging threats. Automation plays a pivotal role in this process, ensuring that alerts are processed at a rapid pace, leaving no room for delays.

However, this ideal scenario is often challenged when dealing with sandbox technologies, particularly older hooking or kernel-mode sandboxes. Analysis within these sandboxes can be time-consuming, sometimes taking anywhere from 5 to 10 minutes. This delay can introduce issues such as analysis timeouts, partial detonations where the analysis remains incomplete, and, even more concerning, the delivery of a benign verdict for a truly malicious file.

Hooking and kernel-mode sandboxes can stall sample submission queues and require more manual triage.
Hooking and kernel-mode sandboxes can stall sample submission queues and require more manual triage.

Stalled analysis: The price of inadequate sandboxing

When analysis stalls, it imposes a significant bottleneck on security automation. The consequences of stalled analysis are far-reaching, as these alerts must be escalated to Tier-3 analysts for manual triage. Manual triage, while essential, is a labor-intensive process that can take from one to three hours for each sample.

The impact of stalled analysis extends beyond operational inefficiency. It can result in erroneous verdicts, with malicious files being incorrectly categorized as benign. The real danger lies in the possibility of malicious software slipping through the cracks. If a piece of ransomware, for instance, is mistakenly flagged as benign and subsequently unleashed on the network, the repercussions can be devastating.

The importance of anti-sandbox evasion resistance

Anti-sandbox evasion resistance is the linchpin that determines the effectiveness of security automation. By minimizing the chances of evasion check failures through hypervisor-based monitoring, organizations can avoid submission queue stalls, misclassification of malicious samples, and the need for extensive Tier-3 manual triage when evasion does occur.

A sandbox’s resistance to evasion is paramount when evaluating it for full automation within a Security Operations Center (SOC). The ability to prevent malware from detecting a monitored sandbox environment and thus displaying its true behavior is a game-changer. When malware fails to identify the sandbox, it cannot evade detection, resulting in accurate threat assessments and reports. This scenario eliminates queue stalls, prevents benign verdicts for suspicious files, and significantly reduces reliance on manual triage.

The significance of anti-sandbox evasion resistance extends to return on investment (ROI) and total cost of ownership (TCO) considerations. It enhances the efficiency of SOC services, reduces incident response times, and aligns with organizational or client Service Level Agreements (SLAs). Speed, accuracy, and streamlined reporting further bolster the case for anti-sandbox evasion resistance, especially in automated workflows.

In summary, anti-sandbox evasion resistance isn’t just a desirable feature; it’s a strategic necessity in modern cybersecurity. In the next section, we will delve deeper into the practical implementation of anti-sandbox evasion resistance and its tangible benefits.

Looking ahead: The Report Clutter Test

In the forthcoming chapter, we will introduce another practical tool to evaluate the efficacy of a sandbox solution: the Report Clutter Test. This test serves as a litmus test for the comprehensiveness and usability of sandbox-generated reports. As we explore this vital aspect of sandbox technology, we will continue to unveil the nuances of modern cybersecurity and the tools that safeguard our digital landscapes.

Combating sandbox evasion for a more effective security automation

Chapter 9: 
Assessing sandbox efficacy – The Report Clutter Test

Table of Contents

See VMRay in action.
Detect and analyze even the most evasive malware and phishing threats.

Further resources


Single source of truth for effective security automation


Checkmate: How sandbox evasion can stall automation

Watch our webinar from at SANS EDR / XDR Solutions Forum


The most advanced malware and phishing sandbox

Welcome to the playground.

Explore what you can do with VMRay.

Click on the yellow dots to check the report formats, see the overview, explore the network connections of the sample, malicious behavior, and relevant files, map the threat on MITRE ATT&CK Framework, analyze and download IOCs and artifacts.

The analysis report tabs are available both for VMRayDeepResponse and VMRayTotalInsight. The bundle of VMRay FinalVerdict and VMRayDeepResponse also offers access to the analysis report tabs.

We’re sorry. 

The interactive tour is not available on mobile devices.

Unveiling the power:
See our experts showcasing VMRay’s capabilities.

Analysis of a malicious file

Join Fatih Akar from the VMRay team as he provides a detailed walkthrough of a malicious LNK file, a prevalent attack vector since Microsoft’s Office macros block.

Gain valuable insights into each tab of our comprehensive analysis report and get a sneak peek into what you’ll be exploring.

Analysis of a malicious URL

Join Andrey Voitenko, an expert in advanced malware and phishing analysis from the VMRay team, as he demonstrates how to submit emails and URLs to the VMRay platform using built-in connectors.

Discover the capabilities of our new Automation Dashboard, enabling one-click automation with your existing EDR, SOAR, SIEM, and TIP tools. Monitor analysis data seamlessly from your VMRay dashboard and unlock new levels of efficiency in your security operations.

Integrating with existing tools

Watch Michael Bourton showcasing the seamless integration of VMRay platform with your existing security stacks.

Discover how effortlessly you can leverage unparalleled detection and analysis capabilities by utilizing dedicated connectors or our Rest API.

Experience VMRay in Action:
Explore Real-world Malware Analysis Reports

Get a firsthand look at the power and capabilities of the VMRay platform by delving into our sample malware and phishing analysis reports.

Immerse yourself in a range of report formats, providing comprehensive insights.

Dive into the overview, explore intricate network connections, analyze malicious behavior in detail, and map threats using the MITRE ATT&CK Framework. See the possibilities to download clear IOCs.

Uncover the capabilities that await you.

Calculate how much malware false positives are costing your organization:
Malware False Positive Cost Calculator